<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>ORDINARY NETIZEN</title><description>|::| rants, reflections &amp; revelations |::|</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>206</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-6140348681100305135</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-21T20:33:02.076-05:00</atom:updated><title>Joe LIEberman</title><description>&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8vS6kIbJu64&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8vS6kIbJu64&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can't believe I ever supported this sell-out.  Have I changed or has he?  After viewing this hilarious (but sadly so true) sock puppet video I'd have to say definitely the latter!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-6140348681100305135?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2009/12/joe-lieberman-obamas-pyrric-victory.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-2476189767640207237</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-21T20:30:09.668-05:00</atom:updated><title>I'm Back (again)</title><description>After more than a year off-line, I guess the Ordinary Netizen has to once again speak with some ordinary common sense because of the insanity we are seeing in the so called health care reform.  Stay tuned for posts on Joe LIEberman and Obama's pyrrhic victory.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-2476189767640207237?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2009/12/im-back-again.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-2425324028750074400</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-11-15T13:10:28.638-05:00</atom:updated><title>YES WE DID</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/Obama_YES_WE_DID-717253.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 302px; height: 400px;" src="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/Obama_YES_WE_DID-717225.gif" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-2425324028750074400?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/11/yes-we-did.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-74950836576147249</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-25T15:04:10.272-04:00</atom:updated><title>Palin's Pipeline of Cronyism</title><description>Despite Palin's lofty claims of "due diligence" and an "open and transparent" bidding process for who is to eventually (possibly) build the pipeline for supplying natural gas to the lower 48, it turns out that there was really only one viable bidder--TransCanada.  Now, this alone isn't too concerning--maybe TransCanada was the only company who could satisfied the requirements.  But that's probably my mid-western naivete giving the benefit of doubt.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, the lead person in Palin's Pipeline team is a woman named Marty Rutherford, who, as it turns out, worked previously for a lobbying firm--and now, you probably guessed it, here comes the rub:  good ol' Marty lobbied for a subsidiary of, yep, TransCanada.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And, last but not least, a cool $500 million "incentive" was given to TransCanada, despite TransCanada's history of agreeing to do the job in 2004 without that sweetener.  Now for my east-cost cynicism--so how much of that $500 million gets kicked back to Palin cronies like Marty?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-74950836576147249?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/palins-pipeline-of-cronyism.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-4149736544782074721</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-24T21:55:01.417-04:00</atom:updated><title>Woman admits making up McCain sticker attack</title><description>Typical crazy republican:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;(CNN) -- A Republican campaign worker who told police she was assaulted by a man angered by a John McCain sticker on her car admitted she made up the report, the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, assistant police chief said Friday.&lt;br /&gt;Police say Ashley Todd, 20, admitted making up the report she was attacked because of a McCain sticker.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ashley Todd, 20, of College Station, Texas, has been charged with filing a false police report, a misdemeanor, and may face more charges, said Pittsburgh police spokeswoman Diane Richard at a news conference.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Todd is incarcerated at the Allegheny County Jail but had not been arraigned Friday night.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Todd was a volunteer for a John McCain phone bank in Pittsburgh, the campaign said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, Sarah Palin spoke with Ashley Todd following the alleged attack.  Man, I'd like to have heard that conversation between two crazy people--one fake &amp; crazy politician trying to be sympathetic to a crazy supporter.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-4149736544782074721?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/woman-admits-making-up-mccain-sticker.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-5995280990298889572</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-21T11:13:21.028-04:00</atom:updated><title>Fun with the Electoral Map - Landslide!</title><description>This is about the best case scenario that I see as possible; some would include North Carolina, but I think that's a bit out of reach.  Either way, it's a landslide victory!  And even with a '&lt;a href="http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/fun-with-electoral-map-worst-case.html#links"&gt;worst case scenerio&lt;/a&gt;' Obama wins.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" id="usermap" width="420" align="middle" height="350"&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.latimes.com/includes/electoralmap/usermap.swf"&gt;&lt;param name="quality" value="high"&gt;&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"&gt;&lt;param name="FlashVars" value="usergen=110100010111111011111010111110110011000001000000110"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.latimes.com/includes/electoralmap/usermap.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" flashvars="usergen=110100010111111011111010111110110011000001000000110" name="usermap" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" width="420" align="middle" height="350"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-5995280990298889572?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/fun-with-electoral-map-landslide.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-9072540437596365387</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-21T11:05:26.017-04:00</atom:updated><title>Fun with the Electoral Map - Worst Case</title><description>&lt;object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,0,0" width="420" height="350" align="middle" id="usermap"/&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.latimes.com/includes/electoralmap/usermap.swf" /&gt;&lt;param name="quality" value="high" /&gt;&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /&gt;&lt;param name="FlashVars" value="usergen=110100010111111011111000101110110000000001000000010" /&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.latimes.com/includes/electoralmap/usermap.swf" width="420" height="350" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" FlashVars="usergen=110100010111111011111000101110110000000001000000010" name="usermap" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-9072540437596365387?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/fun-with-electoral-map-worst-case.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-6162908634694328681</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-20T14:00:20.601-04:00</atom:updated><title>A Sign of the Times</title><description>&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/MMS_Resized_Pix-736217.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/MMS_Resized_Pix-736208.jpg" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Getting fired up to fire local Bush-mate politician!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-6162908634694328681?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/sign-of-times.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-3648798266381379035</guid><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-20T13:59:45.744-04:00</atom:updated><title>Jim Flintlach &amp; George W. Rubble</title><description>&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/Flintlach&amp;amp;GWRubble_blog-771157.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/Flintlach&amp;amp;GWRubble_blog-771026.jpg" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Congressman Jim Gerlach &amp;amp; President Bush - &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;They'll go down in history.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-3648798266381379035?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/jim-flintlach-george-w-rubble.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-6140737293308199888</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-20T13:55:33.429-04:00</atom:updated><title>Joe the Plumber - Give him a Plunger</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/Plunger-743845.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/Plunger-743842.jpg" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;About the only truthful thing that "Joe the plumber" has in common with plumbing is that he is full of shit.  He may not be a licensed plumber, but he's a certified lunatic-fringe, right-wing &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;neocon&lt;/span&gt;, card-carrying, registered republican.   Joe--not even his real first name (it's Sam!)--believes the Iraq war has made us safer, that social security is a joke; he considers government to be akin to over-bearing parents, and that it would be an "honor" to meet &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;McInsane&lt;/span&gt;.  Wow!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, let's see, he's not a plumber, but works for a plumber (but he's not even a journeyman or apprentice).  He's not buying his boss's business (talked about it--but, like 'Joe' says, you  have to "really watch actions"--not just words!), and his boss's business had less than $100, 000 in taxable earnings--not the $250 - $280k that he claimed he would be making when (if) he bought the business.  As for Joe himself, he makes about $40k--and he's worried about making a quarter of a million in taxable income!  Give me a break!  It's bullshitters like Sam, or Joe, or whatever the hell you want to call him, who fit perfectly in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;repugnacan&lt;/span&gt; party.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-6140737293308199888?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/joe-plumber-give-him-plunger.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-4770507350575202234</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-12T15:22:07.348-04:00</atom:updated><title>Fighting the Last War</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/mccain_angry-723354.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://ordinarynetizen.com/uploaded_images/mccain_angry-723351.jpg" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"&gt;Lieutenant Lunatic&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The analogies of McCain fighting the last war are spot on.  Not only in terms of his stance on Iraq, but also in his use of grand "old" party tactics to anger the electorate and spread fear through half-truths (at best), and--more commonly--wanton exaggerations and outright lies.   It doesn't look like that's going to work this time around.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-4770507350575202234?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/fighting-last-war.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-3564075386768147553</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-12T15:36:54.003-04:00</atom:updated><title>Abuse of Power:  Palin is a Patriot Act</title><description>Sarah Palin, the Republican U.S. vice-presidential candidate, abused her powers as governor of Alaska by pressuring subordinates to try to get her former brother-in-law, a state trooper, fired, according to an investigation by the Alaska Legislature released Friday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sound familiar?  Unfortunately, yes, it sounds all too familiar--in the same neocon vein of those who have been stripping our citizens of their rights and whose leader has been reigning like some perverted, capitalistic monarch.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6MJCvHMtwE4&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1"&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6MJCvHMtwE4&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-3564075386768147553?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/10/abuse-of-power-palin-is-patriot-act.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-3560688114680519802</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-08-29T11:29:30.054-04:00</atom:updated><title>OIL, OIL, and more OIL</title><description>So, McSame's VP pick is Sarah Palin.  Her husband is Todd Palin, an oil production operator on Alaska's North Slope.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Need I say more?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-3560688114680519802?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/08/oil-oil-and-more-oil.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-3302658498970287823</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-18T23:05:41.412-04:00</atom:updated><title>Say What?! - A Concern</title><description>Obama borrows Bush policy to court evangelical voters.  Hmm. &lt;br /&gt;I know that Obama needs to win the election, but this is nothing less than a slippery slope.  Obama must not forget that at the core of Bush's failed administration are two intertwined and failed philosophies:  privatizing everything (so cronies can make a killing, I might add) and blurring the separation of church and state.  If King George had his way the United States of America would be his kingdom, in which the governmental theocracy ruled, spied on, and controlled everything yet ran nothing, leaving that to private, including religious entities, so that those entities--not the public--could benefit.  A perfect place for the well-to-do and well-connected, and for those that are the "correct" religion, but it's not America.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Obama, when the government funnels public money--tax-payer's money--to religious organizations, with the notion that somehow the government will simply keep an eye on how it is spent (e.g., not proselytizing) is not only naive, it's fundamentally un-American, dangerous and just plain wrong!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-3302658498970287823?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/07/say-what.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-1180754608838916323</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-18T23:00:20.676-04:00</atom:updated><title>VEEP</title><description>In reviewing the &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/05/for_obama_the_pros_and_cons_of_picking_clinton/"&gt;AP's&lt;/a&gt; 'pros &amp;amp; cons' I, an Obama supporter, am strongly inclined to say that the 'pros' outweigh the 'cons' and that, moreover, the 'cons' can be overcome with the correct message and vp role. Whether or not Hill-Billy can play that way remains to be seen. But, I think it is nonsense to say that their egos are too big to settle for second place. No argument about the 'big ego' but just that being a step from the POTUS is an incredible and historic accomplishment. When I look at all the possibilities, I am in favor of a Obama-Clinton ticket. When you think about it, it would be an absolute blockbuster and more of a change election than the feared "more of the old Clinton era" talk I'm hearing. We are at an historic turning point in American history. The VP should be very strong and be given a rather prominent role...just ask Bush!-)...the POTUS job has grown and needs help with an exceptionally strong VP and cabinet. Here are my top five VP picks, in order of preference:&lt;br /&gt;1) Clinton&lt;br /&gt;2) Webb&lt;br /&gt;3) Hagel&lt;br /&gt;4) Sebelius&lt;br /&gt;5) Biden&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-1180754608838916323?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/06/in-reviewing-aps-pros-cons-i-obama.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-6967253662588621417</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-15T20:27:34.307-04:00</atom:updated><title>Lucky 2013</title><description>2013.&lt;br /&gt;That's when McBush wins the Bush war.  Reassuring, isn't it?  Of course we'll still have troops there, but it'll be like South Korea or Germany or some other far-fetched analogy.  But, rest assured, major combat operations will be over and we will have won (wait a minute! weren't major combat operations over 5 long years ago?!).  Ok, let's be optimistic here...let's not fly off into some sort of lunatic, liberal spin.  Conservatively then, at 10 billion a month, over four and a half years, {quick math}...let's see, hmm, that's only 540 billion more dollars.  Not so conservatively, however, estimates of spending have been as high as &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/21/AR2007092102074.html"&gt;$720 million per day &lt;/a&gt;{I can't even do that math!}.  And don't get me started on the figure that matters so much more...the number of dead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2013 (coincidentally, also the year the X-Men try to overthrow the dystopian rule of the robot &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinel_%28comics%29" title="Sentinel (comics)"&gt;Sentinels&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Days_of_Future_Past" title="Days of Future Past"&gt;Days of Future Past&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; storyline).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-6967253662588621417?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/05/lucky-2013.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-3576142096196296315</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-15T20:03:41.246-04:00</atom:updated><title>The "Republican Brand" - A Sales Job</title><description>You may have noticed how the Repugnacans are talking a lot about their "brand" being damaged lately.  I think that this is a perfect way for them to speak of their party--like some cheap, gimmicky,  piece of junk that it is--and how they are trying  to sell it to the American people.  Like selling ice-cubes to Eskimos, or perhaps more apropos,  a glass of water to a drowning man.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-3576142096196296315?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/05/republican-brand-sales-job.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-1884995804369659058</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-08T22:11:17.332-04:00</atom:updated><title>Obama's VP Short-List</title><description>Heard today that Hillary is on his short-list.  He might do better with another pick, but he could do much worse too.  I know &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;Barack&lt;/span&gt; wants to turn the proverbial page, but you could certainly argue that, despite being a Clinton, a woman vice president IS certainly a new chapter in America's political book.  Here's a tentative list of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;pro's&lt;/span&gt; and con's:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Positives:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;She'd nearly guarantee her huge swath of followers (some of whom may not vote for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;Obama&lt;/span&gt; without her on the ticket) get on board&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Women's&lt;/span&gt; vote&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;White, working class vote&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Older persons' vote&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;She'd consequently help significantly with Pennsylvania and Florida (2 oldest pop states in the union) without which the entire election is in jeopardy&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tenacious campaigner&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Strong assistant with foreign policy and domestic issues such as health care &amp;amp; education&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Bill&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;She'd be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Obama's&lt;/span&gt; Dick Cheney&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Negatives:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;She'd be &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;Obama's&lt;/span&gt; Dick Cheney&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Bill&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Easier for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;repugnacans&lt;/span&gt; to paint them as the ultimate liberal ticket (and not in a good way)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Clinton baggage&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;Ok&lt;/span&gt;, so far the positives are winning.  Anyone want to add a negative or positive?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-1884995804369659058?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/05/obamas-vp-short-list.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-8331806276463330483</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-08T21:31:38.745-04:00</atom:updated><title>Hillary's End-Game</title><description>I've been saying for a month now that her end-game is the VP, and now the talking heads are starting to take this seriously again.  Only today, however, I've started to have some doubts, but they are small.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-8331806276463330483?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/05/hillarys-end-game.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-1918922328311482288</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-11T21:39:51.657-04:00</atom:updated><title>McBush McBlunder?  McBlood for McOil</title><description>The dumb ol' fool just accidentally spoke the truth!  I absolute love the way what was  once propagated as the verboten, left-wing, anti-war propaganda has now become part of McBush's platform.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object height="355" width="425"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TEeTaCq5zcI&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TEeTaCq5zcI&amp;amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-1918922328311482288?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/05/mcbush.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-5143270291221443629</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-15T21:50:09.659-04:00</atom:updated><title>The Bush Era</title><description>I believe that this quote perfectly encapsulates the Bush presidency:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://david-sullivan.blogspot.com/2007/09/justice-douglas-we-need-you-now-more.html"&gt;Big Brother in the form of an increasingly powerful government and in an increasingly powerful private sector will pile the records high with reasons why privacy should give way to national security, to law and order, to efficiency of operation, to scientific advancement and the like. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;-Justice William O. Douglas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-5143270291221443629?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/04/bush-era.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-8035228085954579485</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-11T11:37:13.582-04:00</atom:updated><title>General BetrayUs &amp; Amb. Crock of S---</title><description>Absolutely amazing. Aren't we getting just a wee bit tired of "more of the same?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, not only am I tired of it, I'm so angry at this bastard Bush administration and his flunkies that I simply cannot wait until we have a Democrat in the White House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My analysis of the testimony by Gen. &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;BetrayUs&lt;/span&gt; (again) &amp;amp; Ambassador Crock of S--- (that ain't 'soup' either):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The central issue is that good &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;ol&lt;/span&gt;' moving target of "success" in this war. Ah yes, success and how to define it. We already know that Bush can't/won't provide a reasonable definition of success. Now, here again, we see how that good-for-nothing, Bush-mouth-piece, testicle-less, paper-tiger of a General is stymied by that same question. Sir, if success cannot be defined--I hate to break the news to you, again--then it can't be achieved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I WANT OUT! And whomever will get us to that point faster will get my vote.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And before you even think about the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;McCainian&lt;/span&gt;/&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Bushism&lt;/span&gt;/&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;Rovism&lt;/span&gt; that this is a "reckless retreat," ask yourself this question. How is it reckless to withdraw from a quagmire that has at its core a reckless conception?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-8035228085954579485?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/04/general-betrayus-crock-of-s.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-8781782090158675859</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-05T19:12:55.351-05:00</atom:updated><title>March 4th Breakdown</title><description>Clinton has not only won the powerhouse Democratic states of California, New Jersey, and New York, but also a crucial general election swing state — a major one, Ohio, and other key battlegrounds including Arizona, Nevada, New Hampshire and New Mexico.  Now, add to this another "big state"--Texas, and you can see how Obama could be seen as weak in the general election; if he can't beat Clinton in places like Ohio and Texas, how is he going to be victorious over McCain on Republican home turf?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking of Ohio, the state that gave Dubya his 2004 victory, let's consider another state that gave Dubya the White House--Florida.   Flash forward to 2008 Democratic primary:  It was arguably a tabula rosa-like level playing field for Obama and Clinton because neither campaigned there but both were on the ballot.  And who did Florida go for, albeit in a "mock primary"?  That's right, Clinton--all of which spells more psychological, if not mathematical, trouble for Obama.  Oh, he will most likely win the primary nomination, but that is NOT the big prize.  Without the ability to make a strong statement in swing states like Ohio and Florida--which would have meant at least edging out Clinton--my fear is that he is unlikely to be a force to be reckoned with in November.  And don't even give me that caucus nonsense--last I checked, caucusing doesn't win the White House.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-8781782090158675859?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/03/march-4th-breakdown.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-2332094933394379305</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-23T21:01:19.233-05:00</atom:updated><title>The Shrub that Cried Wolf</title><description>"Somewhere in the world, at this very moment, terrorists are planning the next attack on America," and "They can help class action trial lawyers sue for billions of dollars -- or they can help our intelligence officials protect millions of lives."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;What a bunch of bullshit!  No one believes you and your scare-tactics anymore Shrub.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Never truer were the words of Benjamin Franklin...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;"&gt;Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/1381.html"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-2332094933394379305?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/02/shrub-that-cried-wolf.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6545071.post-196961927013810475</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-23T20:47:49.686-05:00</atom:updated><title>Shame On You Is a Lame On You - Hillary</title><description>"Shame on you Barack Obama... Meet me in Ohio. Let's have a debate about your tactics and your behavior in this campaign.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oh, noo, noo, noo, Hillary, that's not the approach that's going to give you a chance to stay in this race.  It was way too schoolmarm-like and came across as a maternal scolding...to say nothing of the hypocrisy.  I mean, was her, "Obama's health care plan leaves x million people out" any less misleading?  I think not.  You can't have it both ways.  This was a stupid and transparent pose; didn't she learn from the xerox comment that went over like a lead balloon at the CNN debate?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hillary, we already know you are tough...that's not where your campaign has gone wrong.  You'd score much more if you let your kinder/softer side show more often.  That's the way she ended the CNN debate..and now she follows it up with this?!  Still proud to be on the same stage?  If she says anything like that at the next debate I'll puke.  And if she goes nuclear in her attacks, that'll be the end of her campaign and the beginning of her treatment for a Bipolar Disorder.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6545071-196961927013810475?l=ordinarynetizen.com%2Findex.html' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://ordinarynetizen.com/2008/02/shame-on-you-is-lame-on-you-hillary.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ordinary Netizen)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>